Indore (Madhya Pradesh) [India], April 19 (ANI): Congress leader Digvijaya Singh on Saturday attacked Bharatiya Janata Party leader Nishikant Dubey over his statement on the Supreme Court and asked why they are against the decision taken by the top court.
“When Indira Gandhi was the Prime Minister, she was expected to resign based on the judgment made by a High Court judge. They would support the HC judge back then, so why are they against the decision taken by the SC now? You should ask the people of Bihar and Jharkhand what Nishikant Dubey is,” Singh told ANI.
Earlier today, Bharatiya Janata Party leader Nishikant Dubey alleged that the Supreme Court is responsible for “inciting religious wars” in the country, saying the Parliament building should be closed down if the apex court has to make the laws.
“The top court has only one aim—’Show me the face, will show you the law.’ The Supreme Court is going beyond its limits. If one has to go to the Supreme Court for everything, then Parliament and State Assembly should be shut,” Dubey told ANI.
“There was an Article 377 in which homosexuality is a big crime. The Trump administration has said that there are only two sexes in this world, either male or female. Whether it is Hindu, Muslim, Buddhist, Jain or Sikh, all believe that homosexuality is a crime. One fine morning, the Supreme Court said that we abolish this case. Article 141 says that the laws we make, the judgments we give, are applicable from the lower court to the Supreme Court. Article 368 says that Parliament has the right to make all laws and the Supreme Court has the right to interpret the law. The top court is asking the President and Governor to tell what they have to do regarding the Bills. When Ram Mandir or Krishna Janmabhoomi or Gyanvapi comes, you (SC) say ‘Show us the paper’. Mughals ke aane ke baad jo Masjid banne hain unke liye keh rahe ho paper kahan se dikhao,” he added.
The BJP leader further alleged that the Supreme Court wants to take this country towards “anarchy.”
“How can you give direction to the appointing authority? The President appoints the Chief Justice of India. The Parliament makes the law of this country. You will dictate that to Parliament? How did you make a new law? In which law is it written that the President has to take a decision within three months? This means that you want to take this country towards anarchy. When the Parliament sits, there will be a detailed discussion on this,” Dubey said.
His comment came amid the ongoing hearing in the Supreme Court over several petitions challenging the constitutionality of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025.
Notably, the Centre had assured the Supreme Court during the hearing held on April 17 that it would not denotify any ‘Waqf-by-user’ provision and would not include any non-Muslim members in the Board. The assurance comes a day after the top court said it will consider staying those parts of the law.
(ANI)
About The Author
