New Notification on MPs’ Salaries
New Delhi [India], March 25 (ANI): The recent notification from the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs, announcing a 24 per cent increase in the salaries, allowances, and pensions of Members of Parliament and former MPs, has given rise to various misconceptions among the public.
The salaries of Members of Parliament are adjusted by the Centre every five years based on the Cost Inflation Index, thereby preventing ‘arbitrary increase’ in their remunerations. The notification, issued on March 24, 2024, revises the monthly salary of MPs from Rs 1 lakh to Rs 1.24 lakh, with effect from April 1, 2023.
Prime Minister Modi’s Reform on MPs’ Salaries
In 2016, Prime Minister Modi emphasized that MPs should not decide their own pay packages and that such decisions should either be made by a body similar to the Pay Commission or linked to periodic hikes given to certain posts and ranks.
It was based on this strong view that the salary revision mechanism for MPs was changed from a discretionary decision by Parliament to a structured adjustment linked to inflation. The mechanism introduced in 2018 ensures a fair and transparent approach to salary revisions, preventing arbitrary increases and ensuring financial prudence.
Amendment in the Finance Act of 2018
The Finance Act of 2018 amended the Salaries, Allowances, and Pension of Members of Parliament Act, 1954, to link MPs’ salaries to inflation, specifically using the Cost Inflation Index (CII) published under the Income Tax Act of 1961.
Before this amendment, salary revisions were conducted ad hoc and required parliamentary approval each time. The amendment aimed to depoliticize the process and introduce a systematic mechanism for salary adjustments.
Previous Salary Revisions
The last revision before the 2018 amendment took place in 2010, when Parliament passed a bill to increase MPs’ monthly salaries from Rs 16,000 to Rs 50,000. This decision led to significant public criticism, as many perceived it as MPs granting themselves a three-fold pay hike.
However, some MPs, including Mulayam Singh Yadav and Lalu Prasad Yadav, argued that the increase was insufficient and demanded at least a five-fold rise in salaries.
Automatic Adjustments Based on Cost Inflation Index
Under the revised mechanism, MPs’ salaries are now automatically adjusted every five years based on the Cost Inflation Index. The base salary in 2018 was set at Rs 1 lakh per month, with additional allowances, including a constituency allowance of Rs 70,000 and a daily allowance of Rs 2,000, along with other benefits such as free housing, travel, and utilities.
As per the Cost Inflation Index, MPs will receive a salary of Rs 1.24 lakh per month—a 24 per cent increase over a seven-year period, which translates to an average annual increase of approximately 3.1 per cent.
This process ensures that salary revisions are objective and transparent, relying on an established economic indicator rather than arbitrary decisions. Consequently, salary adjustments occur systematically without the need for repeated parliamentary debates or political interventions.
Temporary Salary Reduction During COVID-19
As an extraordinary measure during the COVID-19 pandemic, the government implemented a 30 per cent salary reduction for MPs and ministers in April 2020 for a duration of one year. This decision was made to supplement the financial resources of the Central government in tackling the pandemic.
The temporary reduction was aimed at ensuring that funds were available to support India’s efforts to combat the crisis and provide relief to the public. The cut applied to all MPs, including ministers, and remained in place for a year.
Contrasting Salary Hikes in State Governments
The criticism surrounding the hike stems largely from misconceptions rather than an understanding of the structured process that governs MPs’ remuneration. Many state governments continue to follow an arbitrary and ad hoc mechanism for deciding their own salaries, granting themselves extraordinarily high hikes. This stands in contrast to the structured, inflation-linked mechanism for MPs’ salaries that Parliament adopted at the urging of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
State-wise Salary Hikes
- Karnataka (2025): Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah approved a 100 per cent salary hike for himself, effectively doubling the salaries of the Chief Minister, ministers, and MLAs. His salary increased from Rs 75,000 to Rs 1.5 lakh per month, while ministers’ salaries rose from Rs 60,000 to Rs 1.25 lakh. MLAs and Members of the Legislative Council (MLCs) saw their salaries double from Rs 40,000 to Rs 80,000. With allowances included, their total monthly income will now increase from Rs 3 lakh to Rs 5 lakh.
- Jharkhand (2024): The Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) government arbitrarily increased the salaries of the Chief Minister, ministers, and MLAs by up to 50 per cent.
- Delhi (2023): Arvind Kejriwal approved a 136 per cent salary hike for himself, raising his pay to Rs 1.7 lakh per month, while MLAs received a 66 per cent increase, bringing their salaries to Rs 90,000.
- West Bengal (2023): Mamata Banerjee cited pay disparity with other states as justification for increasing MLAs’ salaries by 50 per cent, raising them from Rs 80,000 to Rs 1.2 lakh, while also granting a 36 per cent hike to the Chief Minister and ministers, bringing their salaries to Rs 1.5 lakh.
- Kerala (2018): The Kerala Chief Minister decided to hike the salary of MLAs by almost 66 per cent, citing an increase in prices of electricity, diesel, and petrol.
- Telangana (2016): Under CM K Chandrashekara Rao, MLAs and ministers received a massive hike of 163 per cent, making them the highest-paid legislators in the country, with the CM drawing Rs 4.1 lakh per month, ministers Rs 3.5 lakh, and MLAs Rs 2.5 lakh per month.
- Himachal Pradesh (2016): The Congress government approved an 83 per cent salary hike for its leaders despite the state already grappling with a severe debt crisis.
The structured approach adopted by the Centre for MPs’ salary revisions contrasts sharply with arbitrary and politically motivated hikes at the state level, further highlighting the necessity for a transparent and systematic framework in determining public representatives’ salaries.
About The Author
